One size doesn’t fit all: on the co-evolution of national evaluation systems and social science publishing
Diana Hicks: Chair of the School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
No. of pages:
Publication type:

Not Available.

Volume 1, Issue: 1, Article 4, 2012

Diana Hicks
One size doesn’t fit all: on the co-evolution of national evaluation systems and social science publishing:
  • Bourke, Paul, Butler, Linda and Biglia, Beverley. Monitoring Research in the Periphery: Australia and the ISI Indices. Research Evaluation and Policy Project, Monograph Series No. 3, Canberra, Australian National University, 1996.

  • Burnhill, Peter M., Tubby-Hille Margarete E. “On Measuring the Relation between Social Science Research Activity and Research Publication.” Research Evaluation, Vol. 4, no. 3, 1994, p. 130-152.

  • Butler, Linda and Visser, Martijn S. “Extending citation analysis to non-source items.” Scientometrics, Vol. 66, no. 2, 2006, p. 327–343. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0024-1

  • Clemens, Elisabeth S., Powell, Walter W., McIlwaine, Kris and Okamoto, Diana. “Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations.” The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 101, no. 2, 1995, p. 433-494.doi: 10.1086/230730

  • Cronin, Blaise, Snyder, Herbert, Atkins Helen. “Comparative Citation Rankings of Authors in Monographic and Journal Literature: A Study of Sociology.” Journal of Documentation, Vol. 53, no. 3, 1997, p. 263-273. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007200

  • Engels, Tim C.E., Ossenblok, Truyken L.B., & Spruyt, Eric H.J.. “Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009”, Scientometrics, Vol 93, no. 2,  2012, p. 373-390. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2

  • Gläser, Jochen “Why are the most influential books in Australian sociology not necessarily the most highly cited ones?” Journal of Sociology, Vol. 40, no. 3, 2004, p. 261-282. doi: 10.1177/1440783304046370

  • Hargens, Lowell. “Using the Literature: Reference Networks, Reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship.” American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, no. 6, 2000, p. 846-865. doi: 10.2307/2657516

  • Hicks, Diana. “Performance-based University research funding systems.” Research Policy, Vol. 41, no. 2, 2012, p. 251-261.doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007

  • Hicks, Diana and Potter, Jonathan “Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: A Reflexive Citation Analysis or Science Disciplines and Disciplining Science.” Social Studies of Science, Vol. 21, no 3. 1991, p. 459-501. doi: 10.1177/030631291021003003

  • Kyvik, Svein. “Internationality of the Social Sciences: the Norwegian Case.” International Social Science Journal, Vol 115, 1988, p. 163-172.

  • Kyvik, Svein. “Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000. ”Scientometrics, Vol. 58, no. 1, 2003, p. 35-48. doi: 10.1023/A:1025475423482

  • Law, John and John Urry. “Enacting the Social,” Economy and Society, Vol. 33, no. 3, 2004, p. 390-410. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000225716

  • Line, Maurice B. “The Influence of the Type of Sources Used on the Results of Citation Analyses.” The Journal of Documentation, Vol. 35, no. 4, 1979, p. 265-284. doi: 10.1108/eb026682

  • Moed, Henk, Nederhof, Anton, and Marc Luwel. “Towards performance in the humanities.” Library Trends (Special Issue on Current Theory in Library and Information Science). Vol. 50, no. 3, 2002, p. 498-520.

  • Nederhof, A.J., Zwaan, R.A. DeBruin, R.E. and P.J. Dekker. “Assessing the Usefulness of Bibliometric Indicators for the Humanities and the Social and Behavioural Sciences: A Comparative Study.” Scientometrics, Vol. 15, no. 5-6, 1989, p. 423-435. doi: 10.1007/BF02017063

  • Nederhof, A.J., Zwaan, R.A. “Quality Judgments of Journals as Indicators of Research Performance in the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 42, no. 5, 1991, p. 332-340. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<332::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-8

  • Nederhof, A. J., Van Wijk, E. “Mapping the Social and Behavioral Sciences World-Wide: Use of Maps in Portfolio Analysis of National Research Efforts.” Scientometrics, Vol. 40, no. 2, 1997, p. 237-276. doi: 10.1007/BF02457439

  • Ossenbock, Truyken, Engels, Tim C.E., Sivertsen, Gunnar. “The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science—a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9).” Research Evaluation, 2012, advanced access, doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs019.

  • Schoepflin, Urs “Problems of Representativity in the Social Sciences Citation Index.” In Representations of Science and Technology, Peter Weingart, Roswitha Sehringer and Matthias Winterhager (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Bielefeld, Germany, p. 177-188. Leiden, DSWO Press, 1990.

  • Verleysen, Frederick T., Engels Tim C.E. “A label for peer reviewed books.” Forthcoming JASIST. 2012.

  • Webster, Berenika M. “Polish Sociology Citation Index as an Example of Usage of National Citation Indexes in Scientometric Analysis of Social Science.” Journal of Information Science, Vol. 24, no. 1, 1998, p. 19-32.

  • Winclawska, Berenika M. “Polish Sociology Citation Index (Principles for Creation and the First Results).” Scientometrics, Vol. 35, no. 3, 1996, p. 387-391. doi: 10.1007/BF02016909

  • Yitzhaki, M. “The Language Preference in Sociology.” Scientometrics, Vol. 41, no. 1-2, 1998, p. 243-254. doi: 10.1007/BF02457981

  • Volume 1, Issue: 1, Article 4, 2012

    Diana Hicks
    One size doesn’t fit all: on the co-evolution of national evaluation systems and social science publishing:
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
  • Dejan Pajić (2015). On the stability of citation-based journal rankings. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4): 990. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.005
  • Elea Giménez-Toledo, Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez, Tim C. E. Engels, Peter Ingwersen, Janne Pölönen, Gunnar Sivertsen, Frederik T. Verleyse & Alesia A. Zuccala (2016). Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries. Scientometrics, 107(2): 685. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-1886-5
  • Manorama Tripath & Sunil Kumar (2015). A Quantitative Analysis of Research Output of Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. International Information & Library Review, 47(1-2): 39. DOI: 10.1080/10572317.2015.1051908
  • Frederik T. Verleyse & Arie Weeren (2016). Clustering by publication patterns of senior authors in the social sciences and humanities. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1): 254. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.004
  • Federico Vase & Ivonne Lujano Vilchis (2017). Sistemas nacionales de clasificación de revistas científicas en América Latina: tendencias recientes e implicaciones para la evaluación académica en ciencias sociales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 62(231): 199. DOI: 10.1016/S0185-1918(17)30043-0
  • Mariela Bianco, Natalia Gra & Judith Sutz (2016). Academic Evaluation: Universal Instrument? Tool for Development?. Minerva, 54(4): 399. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-016-9306-9
  • Dejan Pajić (2015). Globalization of the social sciences in Eastern Europe: genuine breakthrough or a slippery slope of the research evaluation practice?. Scientometrics, 102(3): 2131. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1510-5
  • Andreas Feje & Erik Nylander (2017). The economy of publications and citations in educational research: What about the ‘Anglophone bias’?. Research in Education, 99(1): 19. DOI: 10.1177/0034523717740146
  • Erik Nylander, Lovisa Österlun & Andreas Fejes (2018). Exploring the Adult Learning Research Field by Analysing Who Cites Whom. Vocations and Learning, 11(1): 113. DOI: 10.1007/s12186-017-9181-z
  • Frederik T. Verleyse & Tim C. E. Engels (2014). Internationalization of peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed book publications in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Scientometrics, 101(2): 1431. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1267-x
  • Andreas Feje & Erik Nylander (2014). The Anglophone International(e). Adult Education Quarterly, 64(3): 222. DOI: 10.1177/0741713614528025
  • Export in BibTex, RIS or text