Article | Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics | Gay as classroom practice: A study on sexuality in a secondary language classroom

Title:
Gay as classroom practice: A study on sexuality in a secondary language classroom
Author:
Angelica Simonsson: Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Sweden Petra Angervall: Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
DOI:
10.3384/confero.2001-4562.160622
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2016
Volume:
4
Issue:
1
Pages:
37-70
No. of pages:
24
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2016-06-27


In this study conceptions of sexuality in classroom praxis are investigated. Sexuality and education is a growing field of research, in Sweden as well as internationally, something which has been recently represented also in Confero, not least in the contributions in the special issue “Queering School, Queers in School”. In the introduction to an anthology on gender, sexuality and education, Carlson and Meyer point out that school, as an institution, plays an important role in society when it comes to regulating gender and sexuality since school is a producer of differences in terms of “separable binary oppositions” such as man-woman and straight-gay, that are easily understood within the dominating culture and where one in each couple is usually more highly valued than the other. Carlson and Meyer further assert that school as an institution, in this way, produces gender and sexuality. One example of this is presented by Dalley and Campbell, who in their study of pupil interaction in high school conclude that the male pupils produce heterosexuality, whether actual or pretended, as normal by referencing homosexuality as abnormal. Our reading of these studies indicates that within both formal and informal schooling, meaning and knowledge is produced through everyday practices in which conceptions of gender and sexuality are crucial. In these practices, heterosexuality holds a position as taken-for-granted and normative.



Volume 4, Issue: 1, Article 3, 2016

Author:
Angelica Simonsson, Petra Angervall
Title:
Gay as classroom practice: A study on sexuality in a secondary language classroom:
DOI:
10.3384/confero.2001-4562.160622
References:

Azimova, Nigora, and Bill Johnston. ”Invisibility and ownership of language: problems of representation in Russian language textbook.” The Modern Language Journal, 96.3 (2012): 337-349. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01356.x

Bell, Nancy. D. “Learning about and through humor in the second language classroom.” Language Teaching Research, 13.3 (2009): 241-258. DOI: 10.1177/1362168809104697

Berggren, Kalle. “’No homo’: Straight inoculations and the queering of masculinity in Swedish hip hop.” Norma – Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies, 7.1 (2012): 51-66.

Bolander, Eva, and Andreas Fejes.”Diskursanalys.” Handbok i kvalitativ analys. Ed. Andreas Fejes and Robert Thornberg. Stockholm: Liber, 2015. 90-114.

Bromseth, Janne. “Förändringsstrategier och problemförståelser: från utbildning om den Andra till queer pedagogik.” Normkritisk pedagogik. Makt, lärande och strategier för förändring. Ed. Janne Bromseth, and Frida Darj. Uppsala: Universitetstryckeriet, 2010.

Bromseth, Janne. “Learning the Straight Script – Constructions of Queer and Heterosexual Bodies in Swedish Schools.” Body Claims. Ed. Janne Bromseth., Lisa Folkmarsson Käll and Katarina Mattsson. Uppsala: Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala Universitet, 2009.

Bromseth, Janne, and Hanna Wildow. Man kan ju inte läsa om bögar i nån historiebok.” Skolors förändringsarbeten med fokus på jämställdhet, genus och sexualitet. Stockholm: Friends, 2007.

Brown, Joshua. R. “No homo.” Journal of Homosexuality, 58.3 (2011): 299-314. DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2011.546721

Butler, Judith. Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. London and New York: Routledge, 1990/1999.

Butler, Judith. Bodies that matter. On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge, 1993/2011.

Butler, Judith. Excitable speech. A politics of the performative. New York och London: Routledge, 1997.

Butler, Judith. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge, 2004.

Butler, Judith.”Performativity, precarity and sexual politics.” AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberamericana, 4.3 (2009): i-xiii.

Cameron, Deborah, and Don Kulick. Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Carlson, Dennis, and Elisabeth. J. Meyer “Introduction.” Gender and sexualities in education. A reader. Ed. Elisabeth J. Meyer, and Dennis Carlson. New York: Peter Lang, 2014. 1-6.

Dalley, Phyllis, and Mark David Campbell. “Constructing and contesting discourses of heteronormativity: An ethnographic study of youth in a Francophone high school in Canada.” Journal of language, identity and education, 5.1 (2006): 11-29. DOI: 10.1207/s15327701jlie0501_2

Epstein, Debbie., Sarah. O’Flynn, and David Telford. Silenced sexualities in schools and universities. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books, 2003.

Godley, Amanda.”Gendered borderwork in a high school English class.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5. 3 (2006): 4-29.

Hackathorn, Jana., Amy M. Garczynski, Katheryn Blankmeyer, Rachel D. Tennial and Erin D. Solomon. ”All kidding aside: Humor increases learning at knowledge and comprehension levels.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11.4 (2011): 116-123.

Howarth, David. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000.

Kehily, Mary Jane. Sexuality, gender and schooling. Shifting agendas in social learning. London and New York, RoutledgeFalmer, 2002.

Kulick, Don. “No.” The language and sexuality reader. Ed. Deborah Cameron and Don Kulick. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. 285-298.

Kulick, Don. “Humorless lesbians.” Femininity, feminism and gendered discourse: a selected and edited collection of papers from the fifth international language and gender and association conference (IGALA5). Ed. Janet Holmes and Meredith Marra. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2010. 59-81.

Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso, 1985/2001.

Liddicoat, Anthony  J. “Sexual identity as linguistic failure: trajectories of interaction in the heteronormative language classroom.” Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 8. 2-3 (2009): 191-202.

Malmquist, Anna., Malena Gustavson, and Irina Schmitt. “Queering School, queers in school: An introduction.” Confero, 1.2 (2013): 5-15. DOI: 10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i21g

Martinsson, Lena, and Eva Reimers, eds. Norm-struggles: Sexualities in contentions. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars  Publishing, 2010. 1-12.

Martinsson, Lena, and Eva Reimers, eds. Skola i normer. Malmö: Gleerups, 2014[2008].

Nelson, Cynthia D. “Queer inquiry in language education.” Journal of language, identity, and education, 5.1 (2006): 1-9. DOI: 10.1207/s15327701jlie0501_1

Nelson, Cynthia D. “A gay immigrant student’s perspective: unspeakable acts in the language class.” TESOL Quarterly, 44.3 (2010): 441-464. DOI: 10.5054/tq.2010.226853

Pascoe, C. J. Dude you’re a fag. Masculinity and sexuality in high school. California: University of California Press, 2007/2012.

Pavlenko, Aneta. “Gender and sexuality in foreign and second language education: critical and feminist approaches.” Critical pedagogies and language learning. Ed. Bonny Norton, and Kelleen Toohey. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 53-71. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524834.004

Ringrose, Jessica, and Victoria Rawlings. ”Posthuman performativity, gender and ’school bullying’: Exploring the material-discursive intra-actions of skirts, hair, sluts, and poofs.” Confero, 3.2 (2015): 80-119. DOI: 10.3384/confero.2001-4562.150626

Rasmussen, Mary Louise. Becoming Subjects. Sexualities and secondary schooling. New York & London: Routledge, 2006.

Ripley, Matthew, Eric Anderson, Mark McCormack and Ben Rockett. “Heteronormativity in the university classroom: novelty attachment and content substitution among gay-friendly students.” Sociology of Education, 85.2 (2012): 121-130. DOI: 10.1177/0038040711427315

Sanderoth, Ingrid. Om lust att lära i skolan: en analys av dokument och klass 8y. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2002.

Sikes, Pat. “Teacher-student sexual relations: key risks and ethical issues.” Ethnography and education, 5.2 (2010): 143-157. DOI: 10.1080/17457823.2010.493398

Tornberg, Ulrika. Om språkundervisning i mellanrummet – och talet om “kommunikation” och kultur” i kursplaner och läromedel från 1962 till 2000. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Tryck & Medier, 2000.

Ullman, Jacqueline, and Tania Ferfolja. ”Bureaucratic constructions of sexual dicersity: ’sensitive’, ’controversial’ and silencing.” Teaching Education, 26.2 (2015): 145-159. DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2014.959487

Youdell, Deborah. Impossible bodies, impossible selves: exclusions and student subjectivities. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2006.

Volume 4, Issue: 1, Article 3, 2016

Author:
Angelica Simonsson, Petra Angervall
Title:
Gay as classroom practice: A study on sexuality in a secondary language classroom:
DOI:
10.3384/confero.2001-4562.160622
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment
Export in BibTex, RIS or text