Article | Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics | A queer geography of a school: Landscapes of safe(r) spaces

Title:
A queer geography of a school: Landscapes of safe(r) spaces
Author:
Mel Freitag: Diversity Initiatives, University of Wisconsin-Madison’s School of Nursing, USA
DOI:
10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i21b
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2013
Volume:
1
Issue:
2
Pages:
123-161
No. of pages:
39
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2013-07-08


What does it mean to queer a schooled space? When queers are physically visible in schools, how does that change the power relations and relationships within it? Researchers in the field of Human Geog-raphy have explored physical spaces that are “queered” – the gay ghettos – such as the gay bar, neighborhood, or city. While celebrating these gay spaces, and markers such as the safe space triangle sticker that allies in schools in the USA utilize to mark their offices as places where LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning) students can “go” to feel comfort-able, or at least not bullied, that does not always mean that queers feel safe(r) in those spaces. Also, if one space is marked safe, what happens to the other unsafe spaces? Do they stay intact, and if so, is that to the detriment of all students? Therefore, it is imperative also to define what a safe or safe(r) space is, and then why they should exist at all. According to a recent nationwide survey conducted by Joseph Kosciw, Emily Greytak, and Elizabeth Diaz, nine out of ten LGBTQ-identified youth state they have been harassed and bullied in their schools. This is unacceptable.

One option in particular for queer subjects is to construct, live, and utilize these “queered” cities, neighborhoods, and schools. A physi-cally separated “gay space” could be a countersite for other, more privileged landscapes and narratives. For example, geographer Dereka Rushbrook takes Michel Foucault’s idea of “heterotopias” and defines it as “places that hold what has been displaced while serving as sites of stability for the displaced”, which I will use as a framework in this article. Much of the literature on queer geography has been on isolated or commercialized spaces, neighborhoods, cities, workplaces, bath houses, media, drag shows, sex workers, and more recently on immigration, transnational politics, public health, and globalization. The level of inclusivity of a school, for example, is traditionally a space that holds potential economic and social power for underrepresented students, including but not limited to queer-identified individuals. Queering

Volume 1, Issue: 2, Article 5, 2013

Author:
Mel Freitag
Title:
A queer geography of a school: Landscapes of safe(r) spaces:
DOI:
10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i21b
References:
  • Augé, Marc. Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso, 1995.
  • Bell, David, and Gill Valentine, eds. Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities. London: Routledge, 1995.
  • Binnie, Jon. “Coming out of geography: Towards a queer epistemology?” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15 (2) (1997): 223-237. doi: 10.1068/d150223
  • Brown, Kath, Jason Lim and Gavin Brown. Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices, and Politics. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2007.
  • Butler, Judith. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York: Routledge, 1993.
  • Chavez, Karma. “Spatializing gender performativity: Ecstasy and possibilities for livable life in the tragic case of Victoria Arellano.” Women’s Studies in Communication 33.1(2010): 1-15. DOI. 10.1080/07491401003669729
  • Clandinin, D. Jean, and F. Michael Connelly. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Franciso, CA: Josey-Bass, 2000.
  • Corteen, Karen. “Lesbian safety talk: Problematizing definitions and experiences of violence, sexuality, and space.” Sexualities 5.3 (2002): 259-280. doi: 10.1177/1363460702005003001
  • Duggan, Lisa. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2003.
  • Fleckenstein, Kristie S. “Faceless students, virtual places: Emergence and communal accountability in online classrooms.” Computers and Composition, 22005): 149-176.
  • Foucault, Michel. “Space, knowledge, and power”. The Foucault Reader. Ed. Paul Rabinow. London, Penguin, 1984.
    Foucault, Michel, and Jay Miskowiee. “Of other spaces.” Diacratics 16.1 (1986): 22-27. doi: 10.2307/464648
  • Fox, Catherine. “(Un)covering normalized gender and race subjectivities in LGBT ‘safe spaces.’” Feminist Studies 36.3 (2010): 629-649.
  • Great Lake City School District website. School Demographics, 2012. Pseudonym.
  • Grosz, Elizabeth. Architecture from the Outside: Essays On Virtual and Real Space. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
  • Hetrick-Martin Institute: Empowerment, Education and Advocacy for LGBTQ Youth. (2012). Retrieved from www.hmi.org
  • Hubbard, Phil. “Here, there, everywhere: The ubiquitous geographies of heteronormativity.” Geography Compass 2 (2008): 640-658. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00096.x
  • Johnson, Carol. “Heteronormative citizenship and the politics of passing.” Sexualities 5(2002): 317-331. doi: 10.1177/1363460702005003004
  • Johnston, Lynda and Robyn Longhurst. Space, Place, and Sex: Geographies of Sexualities. Landham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2010.
  • Kentlyn, Sue. “The radically subversive space of the queer home: ‘Safety house’ and ‘neighbourhood watch.’” Australian Geographer 39 (2008): 327-337. doi: 10.1080/00049180802270523
  • Knopp, Larry. “From Lesbian and Gay to Queer Geographies: Pasts, Prospects, and Possibilities.” Geographies of Sexualities. Eds. Kath Browne, Jason Lim and Gavin Brown. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007. 21-28.
  • Kosciw, Joseph, Emily Greytak and Elizabeth Diaz. “Who, what, where, when, and why: Demographic and ecological factors contributing to hostile school climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth.” Journal of Youth Adolescence 38 (7) (2009): 976-988. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9412-1 PMid:19636740
  • Lefèbvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1991.
  • Leonardo, Zeus, and Ronald Porter. “Pedagogy of Fear: Toward a Fanonain theory of ‘safety’ in race dialogue.” Race, Ethnicity, and Education 13. 2 (2010): 139-157. doi: 10.1080/13613324.2010.482898
  • Macintosh, Lori. “Does anyone have a band-aid? Anti-homophobia discourses and pedagogical impossibilities.” ducational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association 41.1 (2007): 33-43.
  • Mayo, Chris. “Queering school communities: Ethical curiosity and gay–straight alliances.” Journal of Gay and Lesbian Issues in Education 1.3 (2004): 23–35. doi: 10.1300/J367v01n03_04
  • Meyer, Elizabeth. “A feminist reframing of bullying and harassment: Transforming schools through critical pedagogy.” McGill Journal of Education 43.1 (2008): 33-47. doi: 10.7202/019572ar
  • Morris, Marla. “Unresting the Curriculum: Queer Projects, Queer Imaginings.” Queer Theory in Education. Pinar (ed). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum, 1988. 275-286.
  • Oswin, Natalie. “Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: Deconstructing queer space.” Progress in Human Geography 32.1 (2008): 89-103. doi: 10.1177/0309132507085213
  • Pratt, Minnie Bruce. “Identity: Skin Blood Heart”. Yours in Struggle: Three Feminist Perspectives on Anti-Semitism and Racism. Eds. Elly Bulkin, Minnie Bruce Pratt, and Barbar Smith. New York: Long Haul Press, 1984, p. 49.
  • Rasmussen, Mary Louise. Becoming Subjects: Sexualities and Secondary Schooling. New York: Routledge, 2006.
  • Rushbrook, Dereka. “Cities, queer space, and the cosmospolitan tourist.” GLQ: Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 8.1-2 (2002): 183-206.
  • Schroeder, Christopher. “Making a space for queer youth: Adolescent and adult interactions.” Gender, Place, & Culture 19.5 (2012): 635-651. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2011.625078
  • Sedgwick, Eve. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1990.
  • Shome, Raka. “Space matters: The power and practice of space.” Communication Theory 13.1 (2003): 39-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00281.x
  • Valentine, Gill. “Hetero-sexing space: Lesbian perceptions and experiences of everyday spaces.” Environment and Planning D-Society and Space 11.4 (1993): 395-413. doi: 10.1068/d110395
  • Warner, Michael. Fear Of A Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
  • Weems, Lisa. “From ‘home’ to ‘camp’: Theorizing the space of safety.” Studies in Philosophy Education 29.6 (2010): 557-568. doi: 10.1007/s11217-010-9199-2
  • Wiesel, Elie. “Forward”. The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code. Eds. George Annas and Michael Grodin. London: Oxford University Press, 1995. ix.
  • Willis, Paul. “From exclusion to inclusion: Young queer workers negotiations of sexually exclusive and inclusive spaces in Australian workplaces.” Journal of Youth Studies 12.6 (2009): 629-651. doi: 10.1080/13676260902902689
  • Volume 1, Issue: 2, Article 5, 2013

    Author:
    Mel Freitag
    Title:
    A queer geography of a school: Landscapes of safe(r) spaces:
    DOI:
    10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i21b
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
    Citations:
  • Leigh Potvin (2016). Radical heterosexuality: Straight teacher activism in schools : Does ally-led activism work?. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 4(1): 9. DOI: 10.3384/confero.2001-4562.160614
  • Export in BibTex, RIS or text