Article | Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics | Pseudo-quantities, New Public Management and Human Judgement

Title:
Pseudo-quantities, New Public Management and Human Judgement
Author:
Sven-Eric Liedman: History of ideas and science at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
DOI:
10.3384/confero.13v1i1a1
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2012
Volume:
1
Issue:
1
Pages:
45-66
No. of pages:
22
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2012-10-09


In this article I will introduce a new concept: pseudoquantities. A pseudo-quantity is a spurious quantity that purports to indicate the dimensions of something but is actually arbitrary and, if taken at face value, misleading. A real quantity informs us about the number, weight or velocity of something and is, in this respect, always more exact than even the most exhaustive verbal description. By contrast, a pseudo-quantity is less nuanced and less exact than a ellinformed and conscientious verbal evaluation.

The term pseudo-quantity is new, but the phenomenon is well known to researchers and has become the subject of a rapidly growing stream of literature.1 The new term would primarily be intended to provide insight into the on-going mechanisms and processes that underlie this phenomenon. Furthermore, this term has a critical potential that is urgently needed at a time when many individuals erroneously believe that pseudoquantities can be used to gain both time and perspective.

In the first part of the article, I will present the new concept and its background in the concepts of quality and quantity. The importance of this term is pertinent to the founding of New Public Management (NPM) in the public sector. NPM will be treated in the following section. I will specifically highlight how this process influences education and research. In the conclusion, I summarise my argument and provide insight regarding a possible alternative.

Volume 1, Issue: 1, Article 3, 2012

Author:
Sven-Eric Liedman
Title:
Pseudo-quantities, New Public Management and Human Judgement:
DOI:
10.3384/confero.13v1i1a1
References:
  • Aas, Gro Hanne. Likhet utan solidaritet? Idéhistoriske studier av karakterer i utdanning og meritokrati. With an English summary: Equality Without Solidarity? Studies from the Vantage Point of History of Ideas on Uses of Marking Systems in Education and of Meritocracy. Göteborg, Arachne, Institutionen för idé- och lärdomshistoria, 2006.

  • Abbott, Andrew. The System of Professions : An Essay on the Division of Expert Labour. Chicago, University of hicago Press, 1988.

  • Abbott, Andrew. “Professions, sociology of.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 18, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2001. doi: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01947-1

  • Agresti, Alan. Categorical Data Analysis.Gainesville, Florida, Wiley-Interscience, 2002 [1993]. doi: 10.1002/0471249688

  • Ali, Carola, Lars-Erik Nilsson et. al. (eds.), In Tension Between Organization and Profession: Professionals in Nordic Public Service. Lund, Nordic Academic Press, 2007.

  • Aristotle. Metaphysics. Greek and English, transl. by Hugh Tredennick, Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard Univ. Press, 1933.

  • ARWU. “Academic Ranking of World Universities”. http://www.shanghairanking.com/. [Retrieved 27 May 2012].

  • Ball, Stephen J. Education for Sale! The Commodification of Everything. King’s Annual Education Lecture 2004. http:,//sys.glotta.ntua.gr/Dialogos/Politics/ [Retrieved 20 May 2012].

  • Berlinski, David. Newton’s gift: How Sir Isaac Newton Unlocked the System of the World. London, Duckworth, 2001.

  • Blasche, S., Urban, W et al. “Qualität.” In Joachim Ritter and Karlfried Grunder (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Vol. 7, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft, 1989, p. 1747-1780.

  • Bostron, Jonathan. “Basic NPM Ideas and Their Development”, in The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, 2011, p. 17-30.

  • Christensen, Tom and Lægreid, Peter (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Mangement, Farnham, Ashgate, 2011.

  • Clark, Chris. “The Deprofessionalisation Thesis, Accountability and Professional Character.” Social Work & Society International Online Journal, Vol. 3:2, 2005.

  • Frank, Robert and Cook, Philip J. The Winner-Takes-All-Society: How More and More Americans Compete for Ever Fewer Fewer and Bigger Prizes, Encouraging Economic Waste, Income Inequality, and Impoverished Cultural Life.New York, The Free Press, 1995.

  • Freeman, Mike. “Is Librarianship in the UK a True Profession, a Semi-profession or a Mere Occupation?”, New Library World, Vol.  98, 1997: 2, p. 65-69.

  • Freidon, Eliot. Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2001.

  • Gore, Jennifer M. and Morrison, Kellie. “The perspectives of a (semi)profession: Challenges in the Governance of Teacher Education.” Teacher and Teacher Education,Vol. 17:5, July 2011, p. 567-582.

  • Hage, Gerald and Meeud, Marius. (eds.) Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change, New York, Oxford University Press, 2006.

  • Hager,F. P., Urban, W. et al. “Quantität.” In Joachim Ritter and Karlfried Grunder (eds.),  Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie.Vol. 7, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft, 1989, p. 1792-1828.

  • Hall, A. Rupert. And All Was Light: An Introduction to Newton’s Opticks. Oxford, Clarendon, 1993.

  • Hasselberg, Ylva. “Demand or Discretion? The Market Model Applied to Science and Its Core Values and Institutions.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, Vol. 12, 2012, p. 35-51 http://www.intres.com/articles/esep2012/12/e012p035.pdf [Retrieved 20 May 2012]. doi: 10.3354/esep00118

  • Heath, Iona. Matters on Life and Death: Key Writings.Abingdon: Oxfordshire, Radcliffe Publishing, 2008.

  • Hood, Christopher. “A Public Management for All Seasons.” Public Administration, 69, 1, s. 3-19, 1991.

  • Hughes, Owen E. Public Management and Administration. New York, Pelgrave, 2003 [1994].

  • Hyland, Terry. ”Professionalism, Ethics and Work-based Learning.” British Journal of Educational Studies,Vol. 44:2, 1986, p. 168-80. doi: 10.1080/00071005.1996.9974066

  • Juran, Joseph M. A History of Managing for Quality: The Evolution, Trends, and Future Directions of Managing for Quality. Milwaukee, WIS, ASQS Quality Press, 1995.

  • Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translation Strategy into Action.Boston, Harvard Business School, 1996.

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science.” In Harry Woolf (ed.), Quantification: A History of the Meaning of Measurement in the Natural and Social Science. Indianapolis & New York, Bobbs-Merrill, 1961.

  • Marglin,Stephen A. The Dismal Science: How Thinking Like an Economist Undermines Community. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press 2008.

  • Neuman, William Lawrence. Social Science Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon, 2011.

  • Newton, Isaac. Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light. New York, Dover Publ., repr 1952 [1704].

  • Null, Christopher. “Dr. Strangelove, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb.”       http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Dr.-Strangelove-or-How-I-Learned-to-Stop-Worrying-and-Love-the-Bomb [Retrieved 27 May 2012].

  • Parkin, Paul A. C. “Nursing the Future – An Examination of the Professionalization Thesis in the Light of Some Recent Developments.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol 21:3, p. 561-67.

  • Pasquier, Martial and Villeneuve, Jean-Patrick. Marketing Management and Communications in the Public Sector. London & New York, Routledge 2012.

  • Poovey, Mary. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society.Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press, 1998. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226675183.001.0001

  •  Slaughter, Sheila and Rhoades, G. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.

  • Ziman, John M. Knowing Everything about Nothing: Specialization and Change in Science Careers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.

  • Volume 1, Issue: 1, Article 3, 2012

    Author:
    Sven-Eric Liedman
    Title:
    Pseudo-quantities, New Public Management and Human Judgement:
    DOI:
    10.3384/confero.13v1i1a1
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
    Citations:
  • Erik Nylander, Robert Aman, Anders Hallqvist, Anna Malmquis & Fredrik Sandberg (2013). Managing by measuring: Academic knowledge production under the ranks. Confero Essays on Education Philosophy and Politics, 1(1): 5. DOI: 10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i15
  • Andreas Feje & Erik Nylander (2014). The Anglophone International(e). Adult Education Quarterly, 64(3): 222. DOI: 10.1177/0741713614528025
  • Erik Nylander (2014). Mastering the jazz standard: Sayings and doings of artistic valuation. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2(1): 66. DOI: 10.1057/ajcs.2013.13
  • Export in BibTex, RIS or text